KKS Kana Preface: Difference between revisions
From My Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Contents = | = Contents = | ||
* [[KKS Kanajo 1|Part 1]] (Introduction) | * [[KKS Kanajo 1|Part 1]] (Introduction) | ||
| Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
= Introduction = | = Introduction = | ||
All complete manuscripts of the KKS contain a preface written in Japanese, which we now label the "Kana preface." A minority of manuscripts also contain a preface written in literary Chinese (the "Mana preface"), but a number of these texts place the Chinese preface at the end of the manuscript. These prefaces have had an enormous influence on Japanese poetry and poetic theory, but they have also raised a number of questions that have not been satisfactorily answered. My purpose here is not to give a complete accounting of the entire history of scholarship on the KKS prefaces, but simply to indicate some of the major interpretive issues -- additional issues of interpretation will also be covered in the translation itself. | |||
== Who wrote the prefaces? == | |||
== What is the relationship between the two prefaces? == | |||
== How important are the prefaces to interpreting the KKS? == | |||
Revision as of 18:54, 9 December 2025
Contents
- Part 1 (Introduction)
- Part 2 (The genesis of waka)
- Part 3 (The early development of waka)
- Part 4 (The six poetic styles)
- Part 5 (The current decline of waka)
- Part 6 (The prior glory of waka)
- Part 7
- Part 8 (Seasonal poetry)
- Part 9 (The Man'yoshu era)
- Part 10 (The six sages of poetry)
- Part 11 (The compilation of the Kokinshu)
- Part 12 (Conclusion)
Introduction
All complete manuscripts of the KKS contain a preface written in Japanese, which we now label the "Kana preface." A minority of manuscripts also contain a preface written in literary Chinese (the "Mana preface"), but a number of these texts place the Chinese preface at the end of the manuscript. These prefaces have had an enormous influence on Japanese poetry and poetic theory, but they have also raised a number of questions that have not been satisfactorily answered. My purpose here is not to give a complete accounting of the entire history of scholarship on the KKS prefaces, but simply to indicate some of the major interpretive issues -- additional issues of interpretation will also be covered in the translation itself.
