GSS 3: Difference between revisions
From My Wiki
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
;兼盛王 | ;兼盛王 | ||
:This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The [[後六々集]] lists Kanemi as the author | :This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The [[後六々集]] lists Kanemi as the author, while Teika's [[定家八代抄]], the [[和歌童蒙抄]], and the [[大和物語]] attribute it to Taira no Kanemori. The [[袋草紙]] has a long note on the problematic attributions of a number of Kanemori's poems, including this one. Modern commenters take various approaches: 全釈 emends the text, with Kifune claiming that it would have been wrong to use the suffix 王 with Kanemori. 新体系 says that this would have been his title prior to 950, and 新注 simply notes the various sources and says that it is probably Kanemori's composition. Finally, 和歌大系 says that either is possible, and notes that the 大和物語 is not necessarily a completely trustworthy source. | ||
= Analysis = | = Analysis = | ||
[[GSS 2|Previous poem]] | [[GSS_Volume_1|Volume 1 Contents]] | [[GSS 4|Next poem]] | [[GSS 2|Previous poem]] | [[GSS_Volume_1|Volume 1 Contents]] | [[GSS 4|Next poem]] | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 2 February 2023
Previous poem | Volume 1 Contents | Next poem
Text
兼盛王
けふよりは 荻のやけ原 かきわけて 若菜つみにと 誰をさそはむ
Translation
Prince Kanemori
Textual Notes
- 兼盛王] 兼覧王（荒・標ィ・全釈）、兼覧大君（堀・慶・片*）
- つみにと] つまんと（八・増）
Other Sources
Notes
- 兼盛王
- This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The 後六々集 lists Kanemi as the author, while Teika's 定家八代抄, the 和歌童蒙抄, and the 大和物語 attribute it to Taira no Kanemori. The 袋草紙 has a long note on the problematic attributions of a number of Kanemori's poems, including this one. Modern commenters take various approaches: 全釈 emends the text, with Kifune claiming that it would have been wrong to use the suffix 王 with Kanemori. 新体系 says that this would have been his title prior to 950, and 新注 simply notes the various sources and says that it is probably Kanemori's composition. Finally, 和歌大系 says that either is possible, and notes that the 大和物語 is not necessarily a completely trustworthy source.
