KKS 51: Difference between revisions

From My Wiki
No edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
山<ruby>桜<rt>ざくら</rt></ruby>わが<ruby>見<rt>身</rt></ruby>に<ruby>来<rt>く</rt></ruby>れば<ruby>春霞<rt>ゝるかすみ</rt></ruby>峯にも<ruby>尾<rt>お</rt></ruby>にも<ruby>立<rt>た</rt></ruby>ち<ruby>隠<rt>かく</rt></ruby>しつゝ
= Translation =
 
[Topic unknown]
 
[Poet unknown]
 
yamazakura                      The mountain cherries
waga mi ni kure-ba              I have come here to see
harukasumi                      And the spring haze
mine ni mo o ni mo              On both the foot and the peak
tachi-kakushi-tsutsu            Keeps rising to hide them.
 
;Mountain cherries
:These are simply cherry trees in the mountains, not a particular type of tree.
 
--
 
= Original text =
 
山<ruby>桜<rt>ざくら</rt></ruby>わが<ruby>見<rt>身</rt></ruby>に<ruby>来<rt>く</rt></ruby>れば<ruby>春霞<rt>ゝるかすみ</rt></ruby>峯にも<ruby>尾<rt>を(お)</rt></ruby>にも<ruby>立<rt>た</rt></ruby>ち<ruby>隠<rt>かく</rt></ruby>しつゝ


* In the base text this poem is inserted in the upper margin above the preface for the next poem. No other text lacks this poem, so this was likely a copying mistake based on both 50 and 51 starting with 山.
* In the base text this poem is inserted in the upper margin above the preface for the next poem. No other text lacks this poem, so this was likely a copying mistake based on both 50 and 51 starting with 山.
* It is difficult to tell whether the use of 身 in the base text instead of 見 indicates a difference in interpretation by the copyist. I have not seen a commentary (ancient or modern) that interprets this as 我が身に来れば so I am inclined to think that the 身 is simply a 変体仮名 form.
* It is difficult to tell whether the use of 身 in the base text instead of 見 indicates a difference in interpretation by the copyist. I have not seen a commentary (ancient or modern) that interprets this as 我が身に来れば so I am inclined to think that the 身 is simply a 変体仮名 form.
* Takeoka notes that 山桜 is written without voicing in the 万葉集, but he thinks there is insufficient evidence to change the traditional voiced やまざすら reading.
* Takeoka notes that 山桜 is written without voicing in the 万葉集, but he thinks there is insufficient evidence to change the traditional voiced やまざすら reading.

Revision as of 19:46, 20 October 2025

Translation

[Topic unknown]

[Poet unknown]

yamazakura                      The mountain cherries
waga mi ni kure-ba              I have come here to see
harukasumi                      And the spring haze
mine ni mo o ni mo              On both the foot and the peak
tachi-kakushi-tsutsu            Keeps rising to hide them.
Mountain cherries
These are simply cherry trees in the mountains, not a particular type of tree.

--

Original text

山桜ざくらわが見身に来くれば春霞ゝるかすみ峯にも尾を(お)にも立たち隠かくしつゝ

  • In the base text this poem is inserted in the upper margin above the preface for the next poem. No other text lacks this poem, so this was likely a copying mistake based on both 50 and 51 starting with 山.
  • It is difficult to tell whether the use of 身 in the base text instead of 見 indicates a difference in interpretation by the copyist. I have not seen a commentary (ancient or modern) that interprets this as 我が身に来れば so I am inclined to think that the 身 is simply a 変体仮名 form.
  • Takeoka notes that 山桜 is written without voicing in the 万葉集, but he thinks there is insufficient evidence to change the traditional voiced やまざすら reading.