GSS 3 - Revision history

Jchristo: /* Analysis */

2023-02-08T18:57:19Z

Analysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 8 February 2023
Line 48:		Line 48:
	The unspoken conclusion to this poem is "you are the only one that would be worth inviting." 「野焼は春日野が有名。前歌の春日山の連想によるか」（新注）「春到来の喜びの歌」（注釈）		The unspoken conclusion to this poem is "you are the only one that would be worth inviting." 「野焼は春日野が有名。前歌の春日山の連想によるか」（新注）「春到来の喜びの歌」（注釈）

	This poem appears in the Tales of Yamato with a response poem (see Other Sources above).		This poem, like the first two, is probably the sort of public poem found in the KKS. But in dealing with the aristocratic practice of the "new shoot" picking, as well as being ostensibly addressed to someone, it suggests the type of private poem that will follow in the collection.

			The term yakebara is not found in the KKS. However, poem 17 does refer to the practice. In the KKS the poem leads into a series of four poems on young shoots (19-22). The GSS places poem 3 in the middle of other poems dealing with the snow of early spring –- perhaps to suggest the mixing of the spring snow with other early spring activities. Kudo also suggests a possible connection with the previous poem –- as the KKS poem above indicates, burned fields were especially associated with Kasuga. So this poem may have been linked to the previous one from that image.

			Ogi, as well, is a seasonal plant that did not appear in the KKS, although examples can be found in the MYS.

			This poem appears in the ''Tales of Yamato'' with a response poem (see Other Sources above).

			「野焼は春日野が有名。前歌の春日山の連想によるか」（新注）「春到来の喜びの歌」（注釈）

	[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]		[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]

Jchristo at 21:10, 3 February 2023

2023-02-03T21:10:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 3 February 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Prince Kanemori		Prince Kanemori

			From today / burnt fields of ogi / making our way through / to pick young shoots / whom shall I invite?

	= Textual Notes =		= Textual Notes =
Line 32:		Line 34:
	;荻のやけ原		;荻のやけ原
	:「春、野火で焼いたあとの荻の原をいう。また、荻の初生の芽が黒いのにたとえたものともいう」（日本国語大辞典）. See also [[SIS 1020]: 「かすがののをぎのやけはらあさるとも見えぬなきなをおほすなるかな」These sources read the term as やけはら, unvoiced.		:「春、野火で焼いたあとの荻の原をいう。また、荻の初生の芽が黒いのにたとえたものともいう」（日本国語大辞典）. See also [[SIS 1020]: 「かすがののをぎのやけはらあさるとも見えぬなきなをおほすなるかな」These sources read the term as やけはら, unvoiced.

			;かきわけて
			:This term would seem to suggest making your way through a dense forest, which is not appropriate here -- it may suggest searching for the 若菜 among the burnt ashes.

	;若菜		;若菜
Line 40:		Line 45:

	= Analysis =		= Analysis =

			The unspoken conclusion to this poem is "you are the only one that would be worth inviting." 「野焼は春日野が有名。前歌の春日山の連想によるか」（新注）「春到来の喜びの歌」（注釈）

			This poem appears in the Tales of Yamato with a response poem (see Other Sources above).

	[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]		[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]

			[[Category:Spring]]
			[[Category:ogi]]
			[[Category:Young Shoots]]

Jchristo at 19:22, 3 February 2023

2023-02-03T19:22:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 3 February 2023
Line 29:		Line 29:
	;荻		;荻
	:Kana spellings include 乎岐（和名類聚抄）、乎支（新撰字鏡）、and 乎疑（万葉集１４・３４４６）. Despite the spelling おき in the 中院本 and 正徹本, it seems that をぎ (with the voiced second syllable) is the historically correct reading. The plant first appears in imperial collections in the GSS (in a total of 4 poems), although it occurs in four MYS poems and one poem in the 新撰和歌. It is not included in the 古今和歌六帖 Starting with the 千載集 it becomes a standard autumn plant.　「下。をぎ原。庭、野などによむ。水辺にも有るべし」（八雲御抄）.		:Kana spellings include 乎岐（和名類聚抄）、乎支（新撰字鏡）、and 乎疑（万葉集１４・３４４６）. Despite the spelling おき in the 中院本 and 正徹本, it seems that をぎ (with the voiced second syllable) is the historically correct reading. The plant first appears in imperial collections in the GSS (in a total of 4 poems), although it occurs in four MYS poems and one poem in the 新撰和歌. It is not included in the 古今和歌六帖 Starting with the 千載集 it becomes a standard autumn plant.　「下。をぎ原。庭、野などによむ。水辺にも有るべし」（八雲御抄）.

			;荻のやけ原
			:「春、野火で焼いたあとの荻の原をいう。また、荻の初生の芽が黒いのにたとえたものともいう」（日本国語大辞典）. See also [[SIS 1020]: 「かすがののをぎのやけはらあさるとも見えぬなきなをおほすなるかな」These sources read the term as やけはら, unvoiced.

			;若菜
			:Picking young shoots is an activity seen in a number of early spring poems -- although there was sometimes a specific ritual associated with it, such as presenting the shoots to the Emperor, here it seems to be a more casual activity. cf. 枕草子: 「七日、雪まのわかなつみ、あをやかに、例はさしもさるもの目ちかからぬ所に、もてさわぎたるこそをかしけれ」

			;誰
			:Early phonetic representations of this word are always unvoiced, and the 日葡辞書 has "tarega" for 誰が. Although 誰 can sometimes be た, here it is clearly たれ to fit the meter (and following other manuscripts that write the word in kana).

	= Analysis =		= Analysis =

	[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]		[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]

Jchristo: /* Notes */

2023-02-03T18:18:37Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 3 February 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:

	;荻		;荻
	:Kana spellings include 乎岐（和名類聚抄）、乎支（新撰字鏡）、and 乎疑（万葉集１４・３４４６）. Despite the spelling おき in the 中院本 and 正徹本, it seems that をぎ (with the voiced second syllable) is the historically correct reading.		:Kana spellings include 乎岐（和名類聚抄）、乎支（新撰字鏡）、and 乎疑（万葉集１４・３４４６）. Despite the spelling おき in the 中院本 and 正徹本, it seems that をぎ (with the voiced second syllable) is the historically correct reading. The plant first appears in imperial collections in the GSS (in a total of 4 poems), although it occurs in four MYS poems and one poem in the 新撰和歌. It is not included in the 古今和歌六帖 Starting with the 千載集 it becomes a standard autumn plant.　「下。をぎ原。庭、野などによむ。水辺にも有るべし」（八雲御抄）.

	= Analysis =		= Analysis =

	[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]		[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]

Jchristo: /* Notes */

2023-02-03T14:48:47Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 3 February 2023
Line 26:		Line 26:
	;兼盛王		;兼盛王
	:This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The [[後六々集]] lists Kanemi as the author, while Teika's [[定家八代抄]], the [[和歌童蒙抄]], and the [[大和物語]] attribute it to Taira no Kanemori. The [[袋草紙]] has a long note on the problematic attributions of a number of Kanemori's poems, including this one. Modern commenters take various approaches: 全釈 emends the text, with Kifune claiming that it would have been wrong to use the suffix 王 with Kanemori. 新体系 says that this would have been his title prior to 950, and 新注 simply notes the various sources and says that it is probably Kanemori's composition. Finally, 和歌大系 says that either is possible, and notes that the 大和物語 is not necessarily a completely trustworthy source.		:This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The [[後六々集]] lists Kanemi as the author, while Teika's [[定家八代抄]], the [[和歌童蒙抄]], and the [[大和物語]] attribute it to Taira no Kanemori. The [[袋草紙]] has a long note on the problematic attributions of a number of Kanemori's poems, including this one. Modern commenters take various approaches: 全釈 emends the text, with Kifune claiming that it would have been wrong to use the suffix 王 with Kanemori. 新体系 says that this would have been his title prior to 950, and 新注 simply notes the various sources and says that it is probably Kanemori's composition. Finally, 和歌大系 says that either is possible, and notes that the 大和物語 is not necessarily a completely trustworthy source.

			;荻
			:Kana spellings include 乎岐（和名類聚抄）、乎支（新撰字鏡）、and 乎疑（万葉集１４・３４４６）. Despite the spelling おき in the 中院本 and 正徹本, it seems that をぎ (with the voiced second syllable) is the historically correct reading.

	= Analysis =		= Analysis =

	[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]		[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]

Jchristo: /* Notes */

2023-02-02T21:11:57Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 2 February 2023
Line 25:		Line 25:

	;兼盛王		;兼盛王
	:This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The [[後六々集]] lists Kanemi as the author		:This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The [[後六々集]] lists Kanemi as the author, while Teika's [[定家八代抄]], the [[和歌童蒙抄]], and the [[大和物語]] attribute it to Taira no Kanemori. The [[袋草紙]] has a long note on the problematic attributions of a number of Kanemori's poems, including this one. Modern commenters take various approaches: 全釈 emends the text, with Kifune claiming that it would have been wrong to use the suffix 王 with Kanemori. 新体系 says that this would have been his title prior to 950, and 新注 simply notes the various sources and says that it is probably Kanemori's composition. Finally, 和歌大系 says that either is possible, and notes that the 大和物語 is not necessarily a completely trustworthy source.

	= Analysis =		= Analysis =

	[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]		[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]

Jchristo at 21:04, 2 February 2023

2023-02-02T21:04:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 2 February 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:

	= Translation =		= Translation =

			Prince Kanemori

	= Textual Notes =		= Textual Notes =
Line 21:		Line 23:

	= Notes =		= Notes =

			;兼盛王
			:This attribution is only found in this poem, and it is not completely clear who it refers to, or if there is a mistake. As can be seen from the Textual Notes, the poem is sometimes attributed to Kanemi rather than Kanemori. The [[後六々集]] lists Kanemi as the author

	= Analysis =		= Analysis =

	[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]		[[GSS 2\|Previous poem]] \| [[GSS_Volume_1\|Volume 1 Contents]] \| [[GSS 4\|Next poem]]

Jchristo: /* Other Sources */

2023-02-02T20:45:08Z

Other Sources

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 2 February 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:

	* [[大和物語]] 86段		* [[大和物語]] 86段
	* [[和歌童蒙抄]]　[[~~袋草子~~]]　[[袖中抄]]		* [[和歌童蒙抄]]　[[袋草紙]]　[[袖中抄]]
	* [[後六々集]]　[[定家八代抄]]		* [[後六々集]]　[[定家八代抄]]

Jchristo: /* Other Sources */

2023-02-02T20:38:46Z

Other Sources

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 2 February 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* [[大和物語]] 86段		* [[大和物語]] 86段
	* [[和歌童蒙抄]]　[[袋草子]]　[[袖中抄]]		* [[和歌童蒙抄]]　[[袋草子]]　[[袖中抄]]
	* [[後六々集]]　[[~~定家八代~~]]		* [[後六々集]]　[[定家八代抄]]

	= Notes =		= Notes =

Jchristo: /* Other Sources */

2023-02-01T19:42:01Z

Other Sources

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 1 February 2023
Line 17:		Line 17:

	* [[大和物語]] 86段		* [[大和物語]] 86段
	* [[和歌童蒙抄]] [[袋草子]] [[袖中抄]]		* [[和歌童蒙抄]]　[[袋草子]]　[[袖中抄]]
	* [[後六々集]] [[定家八代]]		* [[後六々集]]　[[定家八代]]

	= Notes =		= Notes =